Options:
Will matter less than it does in a free society
Is worth the loss of freedom not to vote
Will be an informed or thoughtful vote
Was cast by voters who don't care who wins
Answer:Will be an informed or thoughtful vote.
Explanation:Voting is the process through which people in a democratic setting or Government choose who will govern them. In certain countries or society there are certain laws governing voting in some countries it is mandatory while in other countries it is seen as a Franchise where you can wish to participate or not.
mandatory voting laws are unlikely to mean that each vote cast in an election will be an informed or thoughtful vote.
In mathematical modeling, statistical modeling, and experimental sciences, there are independent and dependent variables.
- Dependent variables get their name because, during an experiment, their values are examined under the assumption or requirement that they are dependent on the values of other variables due to some law or rule (for example, a mathematical function).
- In the context of the experiment in question, independent variables are those that are not perceived as dependent on any other factors.
A body camera or wearable camera is a wearable audio, video, or photographic recording system used to capture events that law enforcement officers are involved in. On an officer's uniform, they are normally worn on the torso.
- The deployment of police body cameras has drawn a lot of media attention in recent years. These tools are widely thought to accomplish a number of goals, including lowering police use-of-force and complaints against officers, improving police legitimacy and transparency, raising prosecution rates, and enhancing police evidence collection.
- Because of all the exposure, many people now believe that cameras can fundamentally alter "flawed" police procedures.
Thus this is the answer of dependent and independent variable and police worn cameras.
To learn more about dependent and independent variable, refer:brainly.com/question/3764906
To learn more about police worn cameras, refer: brainly.com/question/21576230
#SPJ10
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Answer:
D, because bills usually start out by a sponsor or by a senate of state
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Every state court in the United States have jurisdiction over the persons within the territory. The court must have both personal jurisdiction as well as subject jurisdiction so as to have a jurisdiction over a case.
Any court can exercise personal jurisdiction over any defendant unless the statute exists in forum state which explicitly give authorization to the court to have personal jurisdiction over that particular defendant. A defendant must not be a resident of the state in order to have a personal jurisdiction over him by the court.
