This is an example of
"<span>
disinterested rule-making".</span>
Interested and disinterested rules are the two sorts of rules
that are characterized by enthusiasm for good. There are those that emerge out
of want to secure private property, and those that endeavor to direct and
control the conduct of people, disinterested
being the latter one.
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL SECURITY? The answer is a long-term shortfall. Social Security plans for solvency over 75 years, but because of demographic pressures and the weak economy, it is currently solvent only until 2033. After that, without reforms, it would pay about 75 percent of promised benefits.
Answer:
Listeners can become lost
Explanation:
Informative speakers need to judge their audience before they speak. They need to know some facts about their listeners, where do they come from, from which background socially and ethnically, and they may want to know something about their religion or interests. This way they can judge the level of the audience's knowledge about the subject they will speak upon.
If the informative speakers overestimate the listeners' knowledge on a particular subjects, the listeners will become frustrated because they won't understand what the speakers are telling them. They may consider themselves to stupid or not knowledgeable enough to listen to this speech. After trying to understand, they give up in the end and <em>can become lost</em>, not understanding the speaker and the topic he speaks upon.
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
Answer:a true because it could be an emergency
Explanation:yh