All categories

3 years ago

5y(2x−3)=y(x+2)+20 where x=3

Mathematics

2 answers:

grandymaker [24]3 years ago

7 0

5y(2(3)-3)=y(3+2)+20
5y(6-3)=y(5)+20
5y(3)=5y+20
15y=5y+20
10y=20
y=2

Feliz [49]3 years ago

6 0

Here x=3
so, putting 3 instead of x
$5y(2(3)-3)=y(3+2)+20 \\ 5y(3)=5y+20 \\ 15y-5y=20 \\ 10y=20 \\ y=20/10=2$

You might be interested in

6z^6-21z^4-12z^2 give in step by step explanation

Bas_tet [7]

This expression cannot be simplified, as you cannot add or subtract variables raised to different exponents.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the roots of the polynomial equation? x² + 7x + 12 = 0 Enter your answers in the boxes. x1= x2=

oksian1 [2.3K]

The equation factors as
.. (x +3)(x +4) = 0
By the zero-product rule, the roots are
.. x1 = -4
.. x2 = -3

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I’m confused on this question. Can anybody help?

DENIUS [597]

Answer:

I believe the answer is 90

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

a triangles has side lengths of 7, 10 and 11 what is the perimeter of the triangle formed by joining the midpoints of these side

hodyreva [135]

A triangles has side lengths of 7, 10 and 11 what is the perimeter of the triangle formed by joining the midpoints of these sides?

7 0

3 years ago

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$

= $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }$

= 0.00397

5 0

3 years ago