1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kow [346]
3 years ago
8

I’ll give points + brainalist for the correct answer (:

Mathematics
1 answer:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

yup it's d

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Can someone solve this and explain how you did it im struggling with it the problem is 1/2x+4=12
Elena-2011 [213]

Hello!

First: subtract 4 into 12

1/2x=8

Second: divide 8 by 1/2

x=16 because it takes 16 , 1/2 to get 8.

I hope it helps!


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!!!!!<br>What is the answer of the following in scientific notation:<br><br> 4 816 900 000
lord [1]
It's 48,169 x 10^5
Yeah.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Line L1 has gradient 2 and is perpendicular to line L2. Line L2 passes through the point P(2, 1).
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

line L1 and line L2 passes L2.

6 0
3 years ago
A mathematical sentence that contains an equal sign is an
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

An equation

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Question 1: Whose percentage increased more from 1984 to 2014, males or females? By how much more did it increase?
garik1379 [7]

The percentage increase are applied to the number of male and female

from the previous period.

  • From 1984 to 2014, <u>the percentage of females increased more than males</u>.

Reasons:

Let <em>F</em> represent the initial number of females and let <em>M</em> represent the initial number of males before 1984.

We have;

In 1984

Number of females = F × 1.026 = 1.026·F

number of males = M × 1.031 = 1.031·M

In 1994

Number of females = 1.026·F × 1.032 = 1.058832·F

Number of males = 1.031·M × 1.032 = 1.063992·M

In 2004

Number of females = 1.058832·F × 1.056 = 1.118126592·F

Number of males = 1.063992·M × 1.049 = 1.116127608·M

In 2014

Number of females = 1.118126592·F × 1.066 = 1.191922947072·F

Number of males = 1.116127608·M × 1.059 = 1.181979136872·M

Therefore, between 1984 and 2014, we have;

The percentage increase of females = 1.191922947072 × 100 - 100 ≈  19.2%

The percentage increase of males = 1.181979136872 × 100 - 100 ≈ 18.2%

Therefore;

<u>The </u><u>percentage</u><u> </u><u>increase </u><u>of the </u><u>females </u><u>is </u><u>more than </u><u>the </u><u>males</u> by (1.191922947072 × 100 - 100) - (1.181979136872 × 100 - 100) ≈ 0.994%

Learn more about percentages and compounded percentages here:

brainly.com/question/3783619

brainly.com/question/1301322

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the last thing you do as a check inside the car?
    6·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    14·2 answers
  • Common core answer for sum of 5x23x2
    7·1 answer
  • Riley is training to run in a 5-kilometer road race. She would like to
    11·1 answer
  • 19.2 ft by 9.7 what is the area of the room
    10·1 answer
  • A female dust mite is about 0.001378 feet in length and distance from the Earth to the moon is about 1,261,400,000 feet. Rewrite
    6·1 answer
  • A bowler knocks down at least 6 pins 70 percent of the time. Out of 200 rolls, how many times can you predict the bowler will kn
    11·1 answer
  • -15&lt;5(3p-2)&lt;20 I can't seem to figure this one out.
    12·1 answer
  • Let n be a prime number. Which of the following statements CAN be true?
    6·2 answers
  • Lauren says that -3.5 is greater than -3 1/3. Do you agree? Explain.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!