It shall be the letter ........b
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
wow man that is crazy
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
68+97i
Step-by-step explanation:
work shown and pictured
Answer:
The desired equation is y = (-8/3)x + 26/3.
Step-by-step explanation:
Moving from (1,6) to (4, -2) involves an increase of 3 in x and a decrease of 8 in y. Thus, the slope of the line thru these two points is m = rise / run = -8/3.
Using the slope-intercept form of the eq'n of a straight line and inserting the data given (slope = m = -8/3, x = 4, y = -2), we get:
y = mx + b => -2 = (-8/3)(4) + b, or -2 = -32/3 + b
Multiply all terms by 3 to clear out the fraction:
-6 = -32 + 3b.
Then 26 = 3b, and b = 26/3.
The desired equation is y = (-8/3)x + 26/3.