Generally, the best way to proceed when you have concerns about the behavior of a colleague is to deal directly with the colleague, unless doing so would compromise a client's confidentiality.
If they continue doing such behavior, we can make it known to those in charge of company ethics. We can provide the evidence of the violations.
If we are unsure whether their behavior is unethical or not, it is better that we may consult with people who are charged with maintenance of ethical standard the concerns you have.
Also direct complain would not help because we may might have misinterpreted the actions of the colleague. So it is better to watch out and deal directly.
To learn more about behavior here
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Jose is using the Indirect Paragraph plan.
Explanation:
In the Indirect Paragraph Plan, the writer does not directly writes down the purpose or the plan, rather he gradually builds up to the purpose which he states in the body. The evidence, supporting documentation, reasoning, etc are given in the first place of the message, then writer writes the main idea or purpose of the letter or message or writing.
If you think that the reader to whom you are sending the message would likely to have a negative opinion on your writing, then indirect paragraph plan is the best way to approach him.
As in this case, Jose is not sure about the opinion or reaction of the Dean, so he started his message with the evidence, documentation and reasoning and then told his main purpose.
Answer:
b. Students rather than professors constituted the dominant guild.
Explanation:
But for nothern Europe, professors constituted the dominant guild.
