Answer:
Total debt is $15.91million
Total equity is 9.09miliion
Explanation:
Debt-to-equity ratio relates to how a firm is financing its operations through debt versus shareholders' equity(owners' fund)
The formula is: Total debt/total equity
Debt-to-equity ratio = 1.75times
Total assets =$25 million
We know the Equity = Asset - liability(debt)
We can rewrite the equation as:
Debt-to-equity ratio = Total debt/asset - debt
Let's represent debt as 'y'
1.75 = y/$25million - y
y = 1.75($25million - y)
y = $43.75 - 1.75y
Collect the like terms
y + 1.75y = $43.75million
2.75y = $43.75million
y = $43.75million/2.75
y = $15.91million
Therefore, total debt is $15.91million
Using the same formula: Total debt/total equity
Lets represent equity with z
1.75 = $15.91million/z
z = 15.91million/1.75
z = 9.09miliion
Therefore total equity is 9.09miliion
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>
Answer:
C. The monoplist sets price equal to marginal cost to maximize profit.
Explanation:
To maximise the profit, monopolist charge price where MR = MC.
1) let P represent Price, and since the dependency is linear, the supply equation will take the following form:
A) Y- 
= 
⇒ Y - 1,000 = 
⇒ Y - 1,000 = 
⇒ Y = 
⇒ Y = 
, therefore,
P = 
B) When Y = 1,130, the price would be:
⇒P = 
⇒ P = 
Therefore:
P = $194
See the link below for more supply related questions:
brainly.com/question/2822773
<span>Scientific management has evidently made business operations and efficiencies far more successful in their strategies and processes, due to the ability to quantify specific data sets and analyze this information to understand how best to implement a more effective and growing strategy.</span>
