The correct answer is false
Answer:
Explanation:
Ms. P receives $6,000 from Company P due to her husband A's loyal service and She receives $600 that her husband earned prior to his death. Hence, Ms P earns a total of $6,600 ($6000 + $600) gross income.
The amount of $90,000 receive from the life insurance proceeds are excluded from the gross income.
Ms P's daughter receives $4,000 from company P. It should be included in her daughter income.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
A trailing stop-loss order is a special type of trade order where the stop-loss price is not set at a single, absolute dollar amount, but instead is set at a certain percentage or a certain dollar amount below the market price. A trailing stop-loss is sometime referred to simply as a trailing stop.
Answer:
Notes payable; $10,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Borrowing amount = $10,000
Time period = 60 day
Interest rate = 8%
On the due date of the note, avers co. paid the amount.
Therefore, this entry would be recorded by Avers with a debit to Notes payable with an amount of $10,000.
Interest amount = $10,000 × (60 ÷ 360) × 0.08
= $10,000 × 0.17 × 0.08
= $136
(Note: Assuming 360 days in a year)
Therefore, the Journal entry is as follows:
Notes payable A/c Dr. $10,000
Interest Expense A/c Dr. $136
To cash $10,136
(To record Avers pays the amount due in full)
