Hope that helps! If you look it up it's all online!
Answer:
C. shortage of skilled labor.
Explanation:
The invention of high-tech (computers, biotechnology, robots, drones, self driving vehicles and so an) is reducing the involvement of skill human labor which will continue incoming years. For example humans carryout the task of carrying-out calculation several years ago, but in recent years computers carry out such works and at a faster pace. Also routine human works such as arranging, bottling, pasting of labels can be carried-out by well programmed out and trained robots. These and many more will cause the shortage of labor(human) in coming years.
The answer is A. Multitasking. For three reasons: <span>You’re less productive. It is scientifically proven that there is no such thing as multitasking. You're simply switching from one task to another. When your brain tries to switch it needs to rethink about what its doing which wastes time.
You sabotage your ability to do good work. Constantly switching from one thing to another means you can't focus on one specific thing. This often leads to mistakes which means you need to take extra time to fix it anyway.
You squelch your creative juices. In other words when you go back and forth from one thing to another you're preventing your thoughts from developing into other thoughts. Which could potentially prevent a brilliant idea.Stay safe. Focus!
</span>
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
All other things being equal, an increase in the cost of production of a product will decrease the units of the product being reduced and this reduction in supply shifts the supply curve to left while a decrease in the cost of production will increase the units of the product being produced and this shifts the supply curve to the right.
Printed circuit boards is one of the materials used to build computers and since the price has increased, the cost of producing computer also increases and this will make the producers to produce less, shifting the supply curve to the left.
Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
