This is when states become a “laboratories for Democracy”. This means that while federal law may say one thing about a certain issue/policy, there is sometimes overlap in jurisdiction that allow states to go against the Federal Government. A benefit of states being laboratories for Democracy is that they are able to implement policies that they feel is best for citizens of their respected state. A quality example of this would be the legality of marijuana. While marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, many states (colorado, california, washington, etc) have decided that the consumption of marijuana is legal for recreational use, despite federal law that prohibits it.
Having my own house. As a child, it seems fun to have a place to yourself and be able to decorate it however you’d like. As an adult, you realize you have to pay a large amount of money for the house, bills, etc.
Answer:
separation of powers.
Explanation:
In the US, each state has its own constitution. The constitution represents the set of all laws that must be followed in that territory. Although all US states are subject to federal law, each is free to create their own legislation.
In order to protect citizens from states of tyranny, or abuse of power by rulers, the principles that were included in most state constitutions were the separation of powers.
Answer:
The Elements of a Crime. It is a general principle of criminal law that both the physical act (actus reus) and the guilty mind (mens rea) must be present at the same time for a crime to have occurred. Its importance is illustrated by this example.
This passage best exemplifies the concept of a social contract.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation
:</u>
Mayflower Compact was a covenant entered into by the English settlers providing for the rules of self-government when they made their journey to the New World by ship named as Mayflower. This compact was signed by 41 male colonists which included two servants on the 11th November, 1620.
This covenant had laid the cornerstone for the U.S. Constitution. This compact essentially enshrines the theory of social contract which implies that there is either hypothetical or actual contract between the subjects and the ruler and also enumerates the rights as well as duties of every party to the contract.
