1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
13

एक उत्तल लेंस की दूरी 40 सेंटीमीटर है लेंस की छमता की गणना कीजिए ​

Biology
1 answer:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: can you translate this for me plz

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Your heart has four valves. Normally, these valves open to let blood flow through your heart, and then shut to keep it from flow
Ulleksa [173]

Regurgitation influences the flow of blood by mixing the oxygen-poor blood with the oxygen-rich blood. Due to this, the heart has to pump more to oxygenate the entire body, leading to the rapid, and fluttering heartbeat. The tissues get oxygenated but regurgitation could be fatal, as the heart cannot function overtime forever.  

Valve prolapse influences the flow of blood when the flow of blood backs up. This leads to an irregular or racing heartbeat. Even at certain occasions, the blood can flow back to the lungs. However, there is not a huge influence in the oxygenation of the body tissues.  

Stenosis makes the ventricles to pump overtime to get enough blood through, and in the process, the ventricles thicken. This functions for a while, however, it will result in heart failure as the heart cannot do it for entire life. The tissues are oxygenated, but it will be an issue due to overtime.  


7 0
3 years ago
write a paragraph explaining why it is difficult to make drugs or vaccines against HIVgiven the fact that each time reverse tran
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

people who are HIV positive but keep the virus in check. This research stems from the International HIV Controllers Study, and researchers hope that their findings will ultimately help inform the development of new therapies and vaccines. Over the last 30 years, scientists have discovered lots of tantalizing clues about the virus, our immune system, and the interplay between the two, but a vaccine remains elusive.

Since the epidemic emerged, 25 million people have died from AIDS and 60 million have been infected with HIV, according to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. AIDS was detected in California and New York in 1981, first among gay men and drug users, then in hemophiliacs who had received blood transfusions, and later in non-drug-using men, women, and children

Initially, little was known about how AIDS was transmitted, and even less was known about the virus that caused it. In 1985, the virus itself was isolated. Following this discovery, Margaret Heckler, the US Human Services Secretary at that time, famously declared, "We hope to have a vaccine [against AIDS] ready for testing in about two years."

Vaccines have worked well against once widespread diseases like smallpox and polio. After the AIDS virus was found, many people, including many scientists, thought AIDS would be added to the list. Vaccines mimic natural infections, during which the body produces antibodies that kill the virus. But unlike smallpox or polio, HIV doesn’t stimulate this kind of response – our immune systems are generally blind to the virus and unable to launch an effective antibody attack. Other challenges that scientists face as they try to create a vaccine include a lack of good animal models to study and the virus's ability to constantly change and mutate. Additionally, although controllers can keep levels of the virus low, no one has ever fully recovered from HIV infection. This means there's no natural, winning strategy for scientists to study and try to elicit.

Results from previous efforts to build a vaccine have been disappointing. Last year, an HIV vaccine trial in Thailand produced unimpressive results – by some measures, the vaccine reduced the chances of infection by 30 percent at most.

But this summer, scientists discovered three powerful antibodies against HIV and efforts are now underway to transform this discovery into treatment.

In addition to approaches that try to stimulate antibody immunity, researchers are also looking for ways to stimulate cellular immunity, or activate the other weapons in the immune system’s arsenal, like macrophages, natural killer cells, T cells, and more. Alerting the body’s immune system to HIV’s invasion may not prevent infection, but it could inhibit the disease’s progression and keep viral populations so low that there might be less risk of transmission.

One vaccine developed using this approach failed in trials, appearing to even increase some participants' susceptibility to the virus. But knowledge of what happened in that trial may help scientists create a more effective vaccine that targets cellular immunity

By looking at the interaction between the virus and hosts who are able to hold the virus at bay without the help of medicine, researchers hope to learn more about how to fight the virus. New clues from the viral and host genome may help lay a foundation for future means of combating HIV.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
At which type of plate boundary do tectonic plates slide past each other?
melamori03 [73]
The answer would be conservative plate boundaries.

They occur where plates slide past each other in opposite directions, or in the same direction but at different speeds. Friction is eventually overcome and the plates slip past in a sudden movement. The shockwaves created produce an earthquake.

I hope this helped and is correct! :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A dog breed has a pair of alleles that determine curly hair (
Elanso [62]
The <span>hardy-weinberg equation is
p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1
where are already given with
c = 0.1 and C = 0.9
SO
p2 = 0.9^2
p2 = 0.81
q2 = 0.01
0.81 + 2pq - 0.01 = 1
2pq = 0.18
The answers are
CC = 0.81
cc = 0.01
Cc = 0.18</span><span />
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements correct
sladkih [1.3K]
The correct answer is C. Here's why: 

Choice A is illogical. A single experiment does not confirm a theory as true. Multiple successful trials are needed for one to even consider a hypothesis to be accepted as a theory. 

Choice B is wrong. If a scientist finds a new way to test a hypothesis, experimental methods do change. Note that when there are additional ways to test a hypothesis, a scientist should test it with additional methods. 

Choice D is incorrect. If someone finds a way to test a new hypothesis, it would not be made into law since there is more information regarding the theory. This means that it would remain a theory until one can prove that it can't be tested using different methods.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The major effect of genetic drift is
    11·2 answers
  • Which phylum of fungi consists of decomposers that utilize flagellated spores?
    5·1 answer
  • A recessive allele on the X chromosome is responsible for red-green color blindness in humans. A woman with normal vision whose
    6·1 answer
  • What part of the body contains bile, an enzyme that helps break down lipids?
    10·2 answers
  • During DNA replication two identical DNA molecules are produced from one original molecule. Which statements below explains why
    14·1 answer
  • How can champanzeezs have diffrent traits from one another
    10·1 answer
  • What would most likely happen to the chipmunk population in 2014 if the population went up to 22 million in 2013?
    8·2 answers
  • The area monitored by a single receptor is called
    12·1 answer
  • Which layer of Earth has the most mass? A*the crust B the mantle C the inner core D the outer core
    5·2 answers
  • The equation for photosynthesis?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!