I think its true I hope it is correct
Answer:
It has something to do with the goverment and housing, mostly like an housing agrent i am pretty sure
Explanation:
Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Moving is done by the job and how many things they move not usually based on labored time.
Answer:
The service repair company advised Travis of the issues with the steering problems. He disregarded the notice and decided to drive the four wheeler before fixing the issue. Therefore, Travis assumed all responsibility after knowingly driving the four wheeler after being told of its issues. The people who he hit and caused damaged or injury to would clearly have a case against him. Perhaps even if he wasn't aware of the problems and caused damage to their persons or property, he would still be at fault. However, in that situation, he would likely be able to go after the service repair shop showing negligence on their part for failure to disclose this information.
Explanation:
