<span>The Toulmin argument attempts to persuade while stressing understanding and common ground. The Toulmin argument is an informal method or reasoning. There are steps, three parts to the process, that if you follow should bring great support to your argument. </span>
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
Answer: Motivated
Explanation:
Motivation is defined as the process in which a person is enthusiastic to perform any task or heading towards the goal.It stimulates the perform to do something and be interested to perform that with positivity and inspiration.
According to the question,Mr. Hegy's student will behave in a motivated manner towards the learning lesson session which is planned by Mr. Hegy as he is expecting a positive review for them.
Answer: this is an example of <u>operant variability.</u>
Explanation:
Operant variability means that results of an operation may vary so responses are sometimes easy to predict, at other times responding seems highly variable, unpredictable, or even random. The inability to predict is generally attributed to ignorance of controlling variables.
Answer:
(B) True.
Explanation:
For sociologists, there are dominant norms that regulate society's well being and any behavior contrary to these will mean a person is perfoming deviant behavior.
Often psychologists will research on genetic causes, and of course other inner motivations. While in contrast sociologists will explain deviance focusing on how social boundaries, forces, and structures pose conditions where deviances takes place.
Thus psychological explanations take a different focus, they see individuals as unique and primary unit of analysis. They believe human beings are ultimately reponsible in cases of crimes or other acts that are deviant.
The personality of an individual creates conditions for causing this deviances. Of course in some cases mental health issuses or non mental health concerns will link.
