1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yaroslaw [1]
3 years ago
5

Are the teukegee syphilis study and diethylstilbestrol study on pregnant women unethical? Why?

History
1 answer:
Tresset [83]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes, they were unethical.

Explanation:

Yes, the Tuskegee syphilis study and diethylstilbestrol study on pregnant women were both unethical because it is illegal and inhuman to conduct medical experiments on humans without informed consent and agreement.

Both these two experiments were conducted without informing the patients of what actually they were being prescribed and observed for.

In the case of Tuskegee syphilis study, the patients were told that they were being observed and treated for deficient blood while in diethylstilbestrol study on pregnant women, most of them weren't even informed of the experiment. Therefore, these studies were completely unethical human experimentation.

You might be interested in
How successful was the youth involvement in Vietnam ?
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

Well this was i guess you could say part of the US involvement in the cold war. They supported south Vietnam because they didn't want communism from china and Russia spreading their. So when the two together planned an invasion of south Vietnam they announced their involvement to help try and stop it. Also they got involved because they threatened that since they were an ally of ours any attempt to gain land would be met with hostile reinforcement of the area. They were losing heavy casualties and american involvement in the war was not widely supported by the public. Fighting in Vietnam was life and death. Many attacks were deadly as heavy losses on both sides tolled up. We withdrew because most of american citizens hated the war and didn't support it. So the president facing battles on the home front and facing battles in Vietnam decided to withdraw to appease the public. The effects of the withdrawal were that many young soldiers got to see their families again. Many families also were happy as with less money being funneled into the war many new buildings and public services were built. A bad part of the war was after the US left the south was invaded and they ended up with a communist government. Another effect was that the Us pride was hurt and some countries viewed us as weak. 

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help i'm so bad at history!
julia-pushkina [17]
I would say the answer is withholdings.
Withholdings usually take out money for the government and other requirements of payment.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did total war affect soldiers and those on the homefront in World War I?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Answer choices? Please
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ASAP 30 POINTS!!
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

In the 1800s China simultaneously experiences major internal strains and Western imperialist pressure, backed by military might which China cannot match. China’s position in the world and self-image is reversed in a mere 100 year period (c.a. 1840-1940) from leading civilization to subjected and torn country.

The Japanese witness China’s experience with the military power of Western nations, and after the arrival of an American delegation in Japan in 1853, Japan is also forced to open its ports. Japan is able to adapt rapidly to match the power of the West and soon establishes itself as a competitor with the Western powers for colonial rights in Asia. In 1894-5, Japan challenges and defeats China in a war over influence in Korea, thereby upsetting the traditional international order in East Asia, where China was the supreme power and Japan a tribute-bearing subordinate power.

Through the 1700s, China’s imperial system flourishes under the Qing (Ch’ing) or Manchu dynasty. China is at the center of the world economy as Europeans and Americans seek Chinese goods.

By the late 1700s, however, the strong Chinese state is experiencing internal strains — particularly, an expanding population that taxes food supply and government control — and these strains lead to rebellions and a weakening of the central government. (The Taiping Rebellion, which lasts from 1850-1864, affects a large portion of China before being suppressed.)

Western nations are experiencing an outflow of silver bullion to China as a result of the imbalance of trade in China’s favor, and they bring opium into China as a commodity to trade to reverse the flow of silver.

China’s attempt to ban the sale of opium in the port city of Canton leads to the Opium War of 1839 in which the Chinese are defeated by superior British arms and which results in the imposition of the first of many “Unequal Treaties.” These treaties open other cities, “Treaty Ports” — first along the coast and then throughout China — to trade, foreign legal jurisdiction on Chinese territory in these ports, foreign control of tariffs, and Christian missionary presence. By the late 1800s, China is said to be “carved up like a melon” by foreign powers competing for “spheres of influence” on Chinese soil.

From the 1860s onward, the Chinese attempt reform efforts to meet the military and political challenge of the West. China searches for ways to adapt Western learning and technology while preserving Chinese values and Chinese learning. Reformers and conservatives struggle to find the right formula to make China strong enough to protect itself against foreign pressure, but they are unsuccessful in the late 1800s.

The Qing dynasty of the Manchus is seen as a “foreign” dynasty by the Chinese. (The well-known “Boxer Rebellion” of 1898-1900 begins as an anti-Qing uprising but is redirected by the Qing Empress Dowager against the Westerners in China.) As a symbol of revolution, Chinese males cut off the long braids, or queues, they had been forced to wear as a sign of submission to the authority of the Manchus. The dynastic authority is not able to serve as a focal point for national mobilization against the West, as the emperor is able to do in Japan in the same period.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What caused Columbus to think he reached Asia?
Mariulka [41]
He believed he had sailed all the way around the world and didn't know that North America existed. However, he didn't really think he had reached Asia. He thought he had reached the East Indies, an island chain containing Indonesia.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What services did Hull House and other settlement houses offer? Check all of the boxes that apply. Acculturation support Health
    15·2 answers
  • When fighting began in the Korean War in 1950, what major advantage did North Korea possess?
    5·2 answers
  • What caused the decline of ancient Egypt's old kingdom ?
    10·1 answer
  • How are the media most influential in determining what people think and care about?
    13·1 answer
  • Which aspect of the agricultural revolution most contributed to the formation of social hierarchies? (1 point) increased mobilit
    8·2 answers
  • Which type of government combines both unitary and confederal political system
    13·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from US President Franklin Roosevelt’s first inaugural address in 1933.
    5·2 answers
  • Which scenario best illustrates the idea of justice according to the Twelve Tables? A wealthy woman who steals bread should be p
    7·2 answers
  • A violation of the Ninth Amendment would be
    10·1 answer
  • How did each group value Minnesota’s natural resources (like land and rivers): Dakota:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!