Which of the following best explains why a structural formula of a chemical compound is more useful than a molecular formula?

Biology

2 answers:

skad [1K]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

Fittoniya [83]2 years ago

4 0

Answer: Both formulas identify the specific atoms in a particular compound. However, a structural formula also shows how the atoms in a compound are bonded together.

Explanation:

Molecular formula is the chemical formula which depicts the actual number of atoms of each element present in the compound.

Empirical formula is the simplest chemical formula which depicts the whole number of atoms of each element present in the compound.

Structural formula is the formula which depicts the actual number of atoms of each element present in the compound by showing the bonding between the atoms.

Lewis structures show the valence electrons around each atom present in the compound.

You might be interested in

Animal species of the tropical rain forest Select one:

Alexxandr [17]

Im not quite sure but its between have adaptations to minimise competition and Have adaptations to cope with extreme variations in climate

5 0

3 years ago

What happens to the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels of a plant when it does or does not have light?

zubka84 [21]

Explanation:

Carbon dioxide is needed for photosynthesis, but oxygen is needed for cellular respiration. Assuming there is still oxygen then the plants will produce carbon dioxide and some of it will be reabsorbed by photosynthesis during daylight. However, ultimately there wouldn’t be enough carbon dioxide for the plants to grow and they will start to die. Some plants have evolved a C4C4 photosynthesis pathway so they only require a small amount of CO2CO2 to survive, however they do still require more than zero CO2CO2.

So basically you killed off all the plants and all the other non-microbial life died of starvation shortly afterward.

Hope it helps...!! Please mark as brainliest