The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
ignore the other person, the correct answer is A. code of Federal Regulations (CFR), parts
Answer:
b. Liabilities are understated by $4,167 accrued interest payable
Explanation:
Answer:
6,000 Hours
Explanation:
Variable overhead efficiency variance = 20,000 U
(SH - AH) * SVR = - 20,000
Actual hours = Standard hours + 20% = 1.20*SH
(SH - (1.20SH) * 20 = - 20,000
-0.20 SH = -20,000/20
-0.20 SH = -1,000
SH = 5,000 Hours
Actual hours = 1.20 * 5,000 Hours
Actual hours = 6,000 Hours
<u>Explanation:</u>
They are:
- potential access
- realized access
- equitable or inequitable access
- efficient and effective access
According to Andersen, Potential access refers to the availability of resources that would allow an individual to seek care if needed. The Realized access is viewed as the actual use of the care, that is, the individual realizes (or makes use of ) the potential access. Further, Andersen describes Equitable access as a type of access driven by demographic characteristics and need. While Inequitable access results not from demographic characteristics and need but from the individual's social structure, health beliefs, and enabling resources.
A
