Answer:
Quincella's strategy may actually increase her prejudice
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Cognitive research would indicate that Quincella's strategy may actually increase her prejudice. This is because by reminding herself of not to do this, she is subconsciously reinforcing her biases, and therefore actually increasing her level of prejudice.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statement best shows her role in the New Kingdom is the following:
"Hatshepsut became the first female pharaoh to rule Egypt."
After the death of Pharaoh Thutmose II, the pharaoh's chief wife, Hatshepsut, served as regent to young Thutmose III. She later took over full control and appointed herself as the pharaoh.
Hatshepsut, Tuthmosis III, Amenhotep III, and Tutankhamun ruled Egypt during the New Kingdom.
These ancient Egyptian Pharaohs ruled in what historians call the 18th Dynasty of Egypt. This dynasty started in 1549 BC and ended in 1292 BC, and is considered to be a period of great accomplishments for the Egyptians and exerted so much power in the Nile River region. Its importance was so big at the time that some historians have named this period the Thutmosid era. During this dynasty, Egypt was ruled by two women Pharaohs: Nefemeferuaten and Hatshepsut. Both Pharaohs had a great deal of success in a time where only men used to govern the lands.
I believe the answer is: C. traditional model
In a traditional model of diversity, Management of a company wouldn't put much effort in maintaining the balance of different social group in its employees lineup. Up to this moment, is predicted that more than 70% of companies in united states still adopt this traditional model of diversity.
Answer:
Lack of Empathy & Mutual Understanding
Explanation:
Raj & Jamie, recently came together couple, broke up due to a conflict for about two days.
Both of them had made different plans for an evening (Raj - Concert & Jamie - dinner. So, they got disappointed with each other as - one's (Jamie's) plan got cancelled & then she was not in good mood while other's (Raj's) plan, which made the latter also upset.
Instead of fighting, they could have shown empathy towards each other's feelings and could have made an attempt to understand each other's state of mind by putting themselves in other one's shoe. Such empathy & mutual understanding could have helped them solve their issue in a manner, constructive for their relationship & could also have enhanced resilience of their relationship. For eg - they could have surprised each other with a surprise date of other one's choice (Raj - Dinner, Jamie - Movie/ concert) However, lack of empathy & mutual understanding turned a petty issue into huge conflict & broke up their relationship.
True because it will the child to prevent a shock
