Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
Answer:
hydrogen bonds between water molecules.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the scenario being described is a result of hydrogen bonds between water molecules. Hydrogen-bonding occurs in liquid water because the hydrogen atoms found in one water molecule are attracted to the oxygen atoms of another water molecule in close proximity. Thus causing the raindrop to remain intact.
Albert Camus said this in his infamous Gospel of Absurdity
He gave that advice to someone who is currently facing the absurdity of postmoderism. He gave that advice specifically for the people that constantly had suicidal thought from the feeling of unable to fit in within the normal postmodern society.
