Answer:
no
Explanation:
In order to achieve optimal employment level, the ratio of productivity between employees must be equal to the ratio between their wages, e.g. an employee who is 25% more productive, should earn 25% more.
In this case, the productive ratio is 15:20 or 3:4, while the wage ratio is 8:12 or 2:3. Since the wage ratio is lower than the productivity ratio (2:3 < 3:4), the two employees are not optimally employed.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
1. Petty cash A/c $1,100
To Cash A/c $1, 100
(Being the petty cash fund is established)
2. Office supplies A/c Dr $614
Miscellaneous selling expense A/c Dr $200
Miscellaneous administrative expense A/c Dr $145
Cash short and over A/c $26
To Petty cash A/c $985
(Being the expenses are recorded)
The Cash short and over is computed below:
= $1,100 - $115- $614 - $200 - $145
= $26
Answer:
Piazza should sue DGA Corporation because he (or she?) was struck by a company vehicle and the driver was acting within the scope of his normal employment tasks. Piazza might also sue Delaney along with DGA, since DGA is a small corporation and as a corporation is considered a separate legal entity whose shareholder equity might be really low.
Piazza can sue for compensatory damages including pain and suffering, medical bills and lost wages.
Answer:
According to F.A. Hayek, the fundamental problem facing every society is how to use limited resources in the most optimal way possible.
Explanation:
To Hayek, this problem could not be fully solved by any society, but the best a society could do is to rely on the price system, only possible under a free market, to signal which uses were more optimal than others.
This is also the reason why F.A. Hayek, along with fellow Austrian economists Ludwing Von Mises, believe that socialism could not work: socialism, according to Hayek and Mises, destroyes the price system, and without it, society has no rational way to allocate resources in an optimal way.
