I will be discussing my relationship with a friend and what dialectical tensions we faced altogether. So, when I first met this friend, he was a complete stranger to me and we met in a local market accidentally where our shopping bags got exchanged. We met officially to exchange bags and then got to know each other in a formal discussion. Soon, that bonding developed but there was still uncertainty about this bond
(Predictability/novelty). There was some bizarre tension in my mind to ask him out to meet again but then again it was a kind of some uncomfortable pull that didn't let me do it. When I got to know him better I soon realized that he was too open about his things and experiences and I could not be open the same way about my life(Openness/closeness). Another tension suddenly which we faced was to connect properly and that too how to maintain a bond since we shared quite a bunch of things such as the interest in similar books, TV shows, etc (Autonomy/connectedness).
Learn more about relationships here
brainly.com/question/10286547
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the options for this question. However, trying to help, we can say the following.
As a human resource professional, it is important to know that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission views protection against gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination as part of the legislation, even if the U.S. Department of Justice does not endorse this view.
If you work at any position in the Human Resources Department, you have to know that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission supports workers and employees regarding their sexual orientation. No company in the United States can fire an employee due to its sexual orientation because it would violate Title VII that refers to discrimination because of sexual orientation.
Answer should be D. National Security. because National Security is a concept <span> that the government should protect its citizens</span>
