Answer:
Ted is correct. Maggie made mistakes while trying to isolate x for both equations.
Step-by-step explanation:
For 3x-2=0, in order to move -2 to the left side, Maggie had to add 2 on both sides because -2+2=0. The same problem is seen for x+5=0. Maggie had to subtract 5 on both sides because +5-5=0
9514 1404 393
Answer:
14.1 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the compound interest formula and solve for t. Logarithms are involved.
A = P(1 +r/n)^(nt)
amount when P is invested for t years at annual rate r compounded n times per year.
Using the given values, we have ...
13060 = 8800(1 +0.028/365)^(365t)
13060/8800 = (1 +0.028/365)^(365t) . . . . divide by P=8800
Now we take logarithms to make this a linear equation.
log(13060/8800) = (365t)log(1 +0.028/365)
Dividing by the coefficient of t gives us ...
t = log(13060/8800)/(365·log(1 +0.028/365)) ≈ 0.171461/0.0121598
t ≈ 14.1
It would take about 14.1 years for the value to reach $13,060.
75d+8w+25
Part A)
75 and 8 are coefficients because coefficients are the numbers before and multiplied to the variable.
d and w are variables because variables aresymbols to represent the unknown numbers.
25 is the constant because constants are not affected by the variable.
Part B)
75d+8w+25
75(5)+8(48)+25 replace the variables
375+384+25 multiply
784 add
Part C)
No, because his stipend is a constant, and constants are not affected by the variable.
Answer:2
Step-by-step explanation: two ones equal one two
Not possible, we can't answer the question if we can't see the dimensions.
#BestAnswer