1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PolarNik [594]
4 years ago
11

When a voter selects candidates from multiple political parties

Law
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

split ticket voting I think

You might be interested in
Which two cases made drug testing illegal in Us high schools
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

weed n pills

Explanation:

all high schooler know bout weed m where to get it from just don't tell

5 0
3 years ago
Lonnie dies while working on a barge. Lonnie’s widow sues the barge company in state court. The Parties agree on the facts and c
Crank

The motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.

<h3>What is the Longshoreman Act?</h3>

The Longshoreman Act is a federal law that compensates harbor workers and provides certain benefits when they suffer injuries in accidents.

Some of the benefits under the Longshoreman Act include coverage for:

  • Lost income
  • Medical care
  • Vocational rehabilitation.

Thus, the motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.

Learn more about making motions in court at brainly.com/question/13054707

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
The state trial court in nevada issued a decision in which a party was found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future
bija089 [108]

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.

Answer:

No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.

4 0
3 years ago
The Florida Financial Responsibility Law
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

$10,000

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Were the colonists justified in resisting british policies?
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

Yes, the colonists were justified in resisting British policies because taxes and unjust laws—which were not in place before—were imposed on the colonists. In addition, the British government showed less concern for the needs of the colonists; this was evident in the way that British laws and lifestyle was not equally applied to the colonists who were living in another land with Frenchmen and Indians.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Clear agreement not to destroy person by family members.rit number needed.
    11·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Monster.
    7·2 answers
  • Why are renewables attractive to governments
    6·2 answers
  • A person who studies of the causes and effects of disease is
    5·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs.
    6·1 answer
  • Explain 3 aims of sentencing.
    12·1 answer
  • What is 2+2 i will flip shoit if you say 4 if you say 3 i give brainlyest
    6·1 answer
  • What other drugs should be legalized, and what legal drugs should be illegal, and why?
    5·1 answer
  • Assignment: Murder at the Farm Lab
    9·1 answer
  • 2. Which leadership position in Congress has the most power?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!