Answer: B
Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol
Answer:
because the parking lot owner is the one responsible if any car is stolen
Answer:
Even very familiar types of matter (electrons, positrons, protons, neutrons, helium nuclei) pass through familiar matter to some degree, which is why transmission electron microscopes, neutron scattering experiments, proton radiation therapy, etc. work. ( parpaphraze it)
Explanation:
If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1
Answer: D
Explanation:
Im not sure but i think thats the answer
