Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
Answer:
positive reinforcement technique
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Jeremy was probably doing research using a positive reinforcement technique. This is a technique in which the researcher gives the subject something when they perform the desired action, so they associate the action with the reward. In this situation the reward is positive verbal approval from the researcher.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The answer is "Working".
Explanation:
She finds it hard to recall the products on her daily menu while she's in the shop. To have all items on her list, she has to look at something numerous times. But She can tell her daughter all that she did until the very last moment when her daughter questions her as to what she did this week. She has work memory issues.
A. is the answer
ABAB
door rhymes with store
bell rhymes with tell
so ABAB
Answer:
The correct response is the special-interest effect.
Explanation:
This kind of situation regarding the financing of projects with public subsidies is called the special-interest effect. This is a complicated notion because it denotes the tendency for politicians to favor special interest groups that are easily identifiable and that appear well-organized and competent through prior interactions for example. This is because the wider voting populace tends to ignore issues or seems more apathetic. To the individual politician, it seems more efficient and logical to give funds to those interests that are more organized and active. Special interest voters make their candidates and legislators aware of their needs and the projects they promote. In this way, politicians and legislators are led to promote the positions of special interests.
