Answer:
a. They must be an integral part of the finished product and be a significant portion of the total product cost.
Explanation:
The Direct material is supply which is consumed during the production of a product. The direct material should be an integral part in the finished good. Consumables are not direct material. To become direct material the raw supplies should be a significant portion of the total cost. There is no direct material in a service business. The finished product should contain the direct material and the material must be an integral part of the final product.
Answer:
Products D and E should be processed further while product F should be sold at the split off point
Explanation:
Product D E F
$ $ $
Sales at the split off point 10.30 11.40 19.80
Sales after split off point <u>14.90 15.80 22.20</u>
Additional sales per unit 4.6 4.4 2.4
Units sold(units) <u> ×4540 × 6,410 ×1750
</u>
Additional sales revenue 20,884 28204 4200
Further processing cost <u>(14,824)</u> <u>(20,554)</u> <u> (7,520)</u>
Incremental income or (loss) <u>6,060 </u> <u> 7,650</u> <u> (3320
)</u>
Products D and E should be processed further while product F should be sold at the split off point
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": it would reduce the lags inherent in monetary policy.
Explanation:
Inflation targeting is a monetary policy in which the central bank sets a specific target for medium-term inflation and declares the target for inflation. The idea is that maintaining price stability is the best that monetary policy can do to support the economy in the long run.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
usually goods are physical product created to satisfy the needs and wants of costumers while services are not physical product but actions that people do to assist other people.
Answer:
Answer explained
Explanation:
The case is about the defamation claimed by plaintiff on the defendant on the basis of race remark of g a y or bisexual by third party information. This ultimately broken the relationship of two person.
I think that court should ultimately found that the accusations of homosexuality or bisexuality amounted to defamation per se because of the following reason:
- The Race Remark on the plaintiff by the defendant.
- It is a slander per se.
- This remark impute to the commission of the crime of sodomy.
- It is implying Unchastity that means Exposing Plaintiff to Public Hatred. This spoils the life of the plaintiff.