Answer:
Hand Eye cordination
Explanation:
Whatever you look at your body tends to steer towards that direction or place.
Answer: According to the article "The Economics of Private Prisions", the advantages of contracting with private prisions are the prices, which are cheaper than public ones for tax payers, since the company hired is the one responsible for solving any structural demands for example, that is currently generating over 80 billion dollars a year in expenses to be mantained for the government. Also, private companies generate jobs for the community, which could be the other advantage of contracting private prison services. The disadvantages, as pointed in "ISSUES IN CONTRACTING FOR THE PRIVATE OPERATION OF PRISONS AND JAILS", are concerning the fact that those prisons are able to "choose the criminal" according to the offense of the convict, and then aren't obliged to accept all of them as public ones are. Also, the ratio of convicts to employees are higher, and it is reported that these employees face 50% more violence acts against them when compared to public institutions.
The rule of law informs us that laws must be transparent, meaning that they must be
applied in the same way to everyone
Below are some principles of law:
- Superiority of the law
- Separation of powers.
- Known and predictable
- Equal Application
- Just law
- Robust and accessible enforcement. ...
- Independent Judiciary
- Right to parrticipate
<h3>What is law?</h3>
Law can simply be defined as that system of rules and regulations which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties.
So therefore, the rule of law informs us that laws must be transparent, meaning that they must be applied in the same way to everyone
Learn more about law:
brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Answer:
The chief justice would preside
Answer and Explanation:
Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.
Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.
2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.
