Answer:
D. Deflation
Explanation:
"Consumer Price Index" <em>(CPI)</em> measures the changes in the weighted average of prices of a market basket (consisting of consumer goods and services). It tells the<u> cost of living for every consumer. </u>
"Inflation" refers to the sustained increase of prices of goods and services while "deflation" refers to the sustained decrease of prices of goods and services.
In the situation above, the CPI is considered lower than before, thus <u>deflation</u> must have occurred during the second six-year period. It shows a <u>negative inflation rate.</u>
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
The firm set as the required rate of return for the project is 14.732%
Explanation:
For computing the required rate of return, the following formula should be used which is shown below:
= Risk free rate of return + (Beta × market risk premium) + adjustment
where,
Risk free rate of return is 4.1%
Beta is 1.19
Market risk premium is 7.8%
Adjustment is 1.35%
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value wold be equal to
= 4.1% + (1.19 × 7.8%)+ 1.35%
= 4.1% + 9.28% + 1.35%
= 14.732%
The standard deviation is irrelevant. Therefore, it is not considered in the computation part.
Hence, the firm set as the required rate of return for the project is 14.732%
Answer:
The statement has to be classified as very effective or very ineffective.
The correct answer is:
Very ineffective
Explanation:
The word effective means "something that results in the desired effect", therefore, ineffective means the opposite "something that does not result in the disired effect".
In this case, the desired effect is to modify the employee's behaviour. If we as employers drop small hints about what is bothering us, the employee may not be able to understand what we mean, and continue behaving in the same manner.
It is more effective to have clear, straightforward communication in the workplace. If an employee behaviour is bothering us, we should simply communicate it in a direct and respectful manner.
Answer: Harrison will acknowledge a gain equal to the difference between his basis and the distribution . This is because he receives only money in the distribution and the amount transcend his basis in KH. He further allot his entire basis in KH to the basis in the money received resulting in $0 basis in KH after the distribution.
∴ <em>The capital gain will be $6000 i.e. (50000 - 44000) and $0 basis.</em>
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
