Answer:
314 is the correct answer
Step-by-step explanation:
314 is the correct amswer to 628 ÷ 2, however, the answer to 2 ÷ 628 is invalid and would need to be simplified.
Answer:
$936
Step-by-step explanation:
10% is just divided by 10 so 9360 divided by 10 is 936
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
X: number of absences per tutorial per student over the past 5 years(percentage)
X≈N(μ;σ²)
You have to construct a 90% to estimate the population mean of the percentage of absences per tutorial of the students over the past 5 years.
The formula for the CI is:
X[bar] ±
* 
⇒ The population standard deviation is unknown and since the distribution is approximate, I'll use the estimation of the standard deviation in place of the population parameter.
Number of Absences 13.9 16.4 12.3 13.2 8.4 4.4 10.3 8.8 4.8 10.9 15.9 9.7 4.5 11.5 5.7 10.8 9.7 8.2 10.3 12.2 10.6 16.2 15.2 1.7 11.7 11.9 10.0 12.4
X[bar]= 10.41
S= 3.71

[10.41±1.645*
]
[9.26; 11.56]
Using a confidence level of 90% you'd expect that the interval [9.26; 11.56]% contains the value of the population mean of the percentage of absences per tutorial of the students over the past 5 years.
I hope this helps!
If the numbers after the decimal terminate, yes, it's rational.
9.521521521 = 9,521,521,521 / 1,000,000,000
If they don't terminate, but the pattern continues (which I suspect is the case here), yes, it's still rational.
If <em>x</em> = 9.521521521…, then
1000<em>x</em> = 9521.521521521…
Subtract <em>x</em> from this to eliminate the fractional part:
1000<em>x</em> - <em>x</em> = 9521.521521521… - 9.521521521…
999<em>x</em> = 9512
<em>x</em> = 9512/999
If they don't terminate, but the pattern does <em>not</em> continue, meaning the next few digits could be something random like
9.521521521<u>19484929271283583457</u>…
then the number would be irrational.