I believe the pronoun "what" is already properly placed.
It might be stated that Mill employed a combination of formal and informal tone in "On liberty..", by developing some complex ideas, meanings and expressions. The author used metaphors and figurative languages to appeal to the audience. It might be added that Mill wrote those who agreed with him and he discussed his thesis by attacking the conservatives.
He used frases such as <span> "no one's idea," "no one should assert," "it would be absurd," "nobody denies" . </span>
The author's cultural background affect his perception as the author is working towards providing people who lack a similar values about life an opportunity to align with how he sees the world through nature.
<h3>What is your cultural background?</h3>
This is said to be a person's social and racial origins, that is where they came from and also their financial status and others.
Note that The author's cultural background affect his perception as the author is working towards providing people who lack a similar values about life an opportunity to align with how he sees the world through nature.
Therefore, option b is correct.
See options below
Select the correct answer.
How does the author's cultural background affect his perception of the ideas presented in the poem?
A.
The author views his beliefs to be above the beliefs of other's in the world and uses his poetry to show the lack of similar values about life principles.
B.
The author is working towards providing people who lack a similar values about life an opportunity to align with how he sees the world through nature.
C.
The author's experiences in life reflect a journey that is both physical and spiritual and he shares this through his work by using life principles people often overlook.
D.
The author's personification of concepts like truth and dreaming show how much value and precedence these principles among others fail to take within his culture.
Learn more about Rabindranath Tagore from
brainly.com/question/27325380
#SPJ1
The ruling I would make on the charge of treason against John Brown, is guilty. Since the belief in transcendentalism is basically to be living on your own and not living under the government many are able to see how this may be illegal and wrong to the government. This also just gives people the opportunity to do whatever they want whether or not it is good or bad. Also, John Brown was convicted of treason due to the murder of five men and inciting a slave insurrection. I understand where John Brown was coming from, in the fact that slavery is wrong and should have been abolished. But there comes a time where we cannot recreate the actions of our enemies to retaliate, we must bring about a peaceful measure to combat these problems or else we become no better than our enemies. Then there was Ralph Waldo Emerson who just so happened to be a transcendentalist. He believed he did not have to live under the government and pay taxes and follow their society rules. He wrote poetry and he was a essayist he led the transcendentalist movement of the mid-19th century. I don't think transcendentalism is the answer to our problems with the government, it just makes it seem like we are acting like children and pretending the problem isn't there or choosing to ignore everything around us and act like we live in a bubble. This is why I believe John Brown should be guilty.
i just added more words to help reach the 250 word count :) hope this helps!
