1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Roman55 [17]
3 years ago
9

Whose socialist theories influenced American labor leaders

History
1 answer:
podryga [215]3 years ago
4 0

Explanation:

The history of the socialist movement in the United States spans a variety of tendencies, including anarchists, communists, democratic socialists, Marxists, Marxist–Leninists, social democrats, Trotskyists and utopian socialists. It began with utopian communities in the early 19th century such as the Shakers, the activist visionary Josiah Warren and intentional communities inspired by Charles Fourier. Labor activists, usually British, German, or Jewish immigrants, founded the Socialist Labor Party of America in 1877. The Socialist Party of America was established in 1901. By that time, anarchism also rose to prominence around the country. Socialists of different tendencies were involved in early American labor organizations and struggles. These reached a high point in the Haymarket affair in Chicago which started International Workers' Day as the main workers holiday around the world, Labor Day and making the eight-hour day a worldwide objective by workers organizations and socialist parties worldwide.[1]

Under Socialist Party of America presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs, socialist opposition to World War I led to the governmental repression collectively known as the First Red Scare. The Socialist Party declined in the 1920s, but the party nonetheless often ran Norman Thomas for President. In the 1930s, the Communist Party USA took importance in labor and racial struggles while it suffered a split which converged in the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party. In the 1950s, socialism was affected by McCarthyism and in the 1960s it was revived by the general radicalization brought by the New Left and other social struggles and revolts. In the 1960s, Michael Harrington and other socialists were called to assist the Kennedy administration and then the Johnson administration's War on Poverty and Great Society[2] while socialists also played important roles in the civil rights movement.[3][4][5][6]

Unlike in Canada, Europe and Oceania, a major social-democratic party has never materialized in the United States[7] and the socialist movement in the United States was relatively weak in comparison.[8] In the United States, socialism can be stigmatized because is commonly associated with authoritarian socialism, the Soviet Union and other authoritarian communist regimes.[9] Writing for The Economist, Samuel Jackson argued that socialism has been used as a pejorative term, without any clear definition, by conservatives and libertarians to taint liberal and progressive policies, proposals and public figures.[10] The term socialization has been mistakenly used to refer to any state or government-operated industry or service (the proper term for such being either municipalization or nationalization). This has also been incorrectly used to mean any tax-funded programs, whether privately run or government run. Socialism has been used to argue against economic interventionism, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Medicare, the New Deal, Social Security and universal single-payer health care, among others.[11][12]

Milwaukee has had several socialist mayors such as Emil Seidel, Daniel Hoan and Frank Zeidler whilst Socialist Party presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs won nearly one million votes in the 1920 presidential election.[13][14] Self-declared democratic socialist Bernie Sanders won 13 million votes in the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primary, gaining considerable popular support, particularly among the younger generation and the working class.[15][16][17] One 2018 poll reported 37% of American adults had a positive view of socialism and 56% had a positive view of capitalism.[18]

You might be interested in
why do you think congress amended to the constitution to require that no president serve longer than 2 terms? do you agree with
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

I think congress amended to the constitution to require that no president serve more than 2 terms as to be sure no president turned into a king or tyrannical leader. I agree with this amendment as it helps keep order and wont allow any president to overstay their welcome and gain to much power. The founding fathers were just escaping a king and they would not want a president to be like a king.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is the "modern" hannah's attitude toward her family and jewish culture at the beginning of the movie and why?
adelina 88 [10]

Which movie are you referring to?

6 0
3 years ago
Under Roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed
anzhelika [568]
. Under roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed proof that a crime had been committed. The accused h<span>ad the right to face the accuser and offer a defense.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who could a colonist blame if he or she were unhappy with the actions of the ruling governor?
VMariaS [17]
In 1763, a worldwide imperial conflict called the Seven Years' War ended in resounding victory for the British Empire, which smashed its European rivals to emerge from the conflict as one of the largest and most powerful empires in world history. North America had been just one of many fronts in the global Seven Years' War, which American colonists usually called the French and Indian War in honor of their enemies in the conflict. In the end, the French and their Indian allies fell to British and colonial forces, leaving England officially in control of the whole part of North America east of the Mississippi River and north of Florida. Of course, the several hundred thousand Native Americans who inhabited the continent would not have seen it that way. But for Englishmen everywhere, the war's end was a time of triumph and liberty. Englishmen enjoyed more rights and freedoms than the subjects of any other world empire at the time. The colonists reveled in the victory they had helped the mother country to achieve. Colonists in 1763 would have thought the very idea of independence unthinkable, and probably downright mad.

6 0
3 years ago
Please help!! 12 points
solmaris [256]

Answer:

the last one

Explanation:

Appeasement was a mistake because it did not prevent war. Instead, it only postponed the war, which was actually a bad thing. Postponing the war was a bad thing because all it did was to give Hitler time to increase his power. When Hitler started violating the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was still rather weak.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!
    8·1 answer
  • I need help with this question!!
    7·2 answers
  • In which year was Nelson Mandela released from prison? need help
    12·1 answer
  • What is another name for "the land between two rivers?"
    8·2 answers
  • What event in 1914 led to the outbreak of ww2
    10·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers.
    6·1 answer
  • A strong middle class grew during the period of industrialization
    8·2 answers
  • If a state government makes a formal request that the president deploy federal troops, the president
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these groups benefited from the Proclamation of 1763?
    9·2 answers
  • Did sumarians have an advanced economy relative to their time and place
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!