Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
The answer is B 1/6 just divide the first number by the second one<span />
Answer:
Explanation:
<u />
<u>1) Horizontal component</u>
The horizontal component is related to the magnitude of the force by the cosine ratio:
Where α in the angle (-10º), Fx is the horizontal component, and | F | is the magnitude of the force (17).
- cos(-10º) = Fx / 17 ⇒ Fx = cos (-10º) × 17 = 16.74
<u />
<u>2) Vertical component</u>
The vertical component is related to the magnitude of the force by the sine ratio:
Where α in the angle (-10º), Fy is the vertical component, and | F | is the magnitude of the force (17).
- sin(-10º) = Fy / 17 ⇒ Fy = sin (-10º) × 17 = -2.95
<u />
<u>3) Form (x,y)</u>
Answer:
155
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that below sea level means negative. So 120-(-35)=155
I hope this helps! :)
yards/costumes:16/(5/2) = X/(19/2)
Cross multiply.
(5/2)x = 152
Multiply both sides by 2/5.
x = 101 1/3 yards