1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cluponka [151]
2 years ago
15

Using the characters from a favorite story or one you create, write a sentence in first person, then rewrite the sentence in sec

ond person. Write the same sentence again but in third person omniscient and then in third person limited. Finally, write it in third person objective. You will have five similar sentences from five different points of view
English
1 answer:
OverLord2011 [107]2 years ago
6 0

Answer and Explanation:

"I am not an angel, nor will I ever be. I will be myself." This sentence is written in the first person. This type of narration occurs when the character himself is narrating the story in which he participates.

"You are not an angel and you never will be. You will be yourself." This sentence is written in second person. This type of sentence can be identified by the use of the pronoun "you" where the narrator speaks directly to the reader, or to someone.

"She was not an angel and never would be. She will always be herself." This sentence is written in an omniscient third person, who is a narrator who has access to all aspects of a story and a character, knowing the thoughts of the character and even his past, present and future.

"Jane was not an angel. She would never wish to be an angel. She will always be herself." This sentence is in a limited third person, where the narrator only has access to the thoughts and experiences of a person, that is, a character. This type of narration is similar to first person narration, but it is not the character that tells the story itself and has the predominance of the pronouns "she", "he" and "it".

"She was not an angel and never would be. She will always be herself." This sentence is written in an omniscient third person, who is a narrator who has access to all aspects of a story and a character, knowing the thoughts of the character and even his past, present and future.

"Jane was not an angel. She would never wish to be an angel. She will always be herself." This sentence is in a limited third person, where the narrator only has access to the thoughts and experiences of a person, that is, a character. This type of narration is similar to first person narration, but it is not the character that tells the story itself and has the predominance of the pronouns "she", "he" and "it".

"Jane was not an angel." This sentence is written in an objective third person, which presents a narrator who does not have access to the feelings of a character and narrates the story in a more superficial and observational way.

You might be interested in
Which sentence is written correctly? A. That cheese tastes more sharper than the first one. B. Of the three, Liam waited in line
Natali [406]

C is the correct answer.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the problem at the beginning of the story
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

mom would not let them go without her

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read this excerpt from "Birdfoot's Grampa." 1 The rain was falling, a mist about his white hair and I kept saying you can't save
Vladimir [108]

Answer: The man has white hair

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
4. Read the following EXCERPT from MERCUTIOS MONOLOGUE about queen MAB bringer of dreams from Romeo and Juliet:
shutvik [7]
What the answer??????
5 0
2 years ago
Write a five paragraph letter in response to the sample analysis (click here to access the text), arguing either of the followin
stich3 [128]

The response required here is an argumentative essay. See how to write one below.

<h3>How do you write an argumentative essay?</h3>

1. First lay out your claim in the introduction:

It is false to state that "The court represents chaos and the woods represents order." The sample analysis proves otherwise, that is "The court represents order and the woods represents chaos.

From the sample analysis, textual evidence provides that The court gave an an edict that must be binding on Hermia because of her rebellion. This is a representation of order.

On the other hand, the woods which is populated by fairies (especially mischievous ones) are notorious for causing chaos. For example, they are preoccupied with disrupting relationships in human by spraying love portion on their eyelids as they sleep.

This is the mischief that befell Egregious daughter. It is to be noted that she eventually settled upon her fathers choice and life happily every after. This is proof that the woods were authors of chaos.

Suffice it so say that against the foregoing, it would be false to assert that  "The court represents chaos and the woods represents order."

Learn more about argumentative essays at;
brainly.com/question/22740197
#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A little speech on mother
    13·2 answers
  • The foghorn across the bay sounded especially loud this morning.
    14·1 answer
  • 18. Which of the following alignments is easiest to read? (1 point)
    8·2 answers
  • Most reasonable assume that a pullet is a
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! THIS IS FROM THE GREAT GATSBY!!!! CORRECT ANSWER ONLY PLEASE!!!
    11·2 answers
  • The point of view in a fictional text is the outlook of the
    8·1 answer
  • Do you think the republican sniper is a hero or a victim of war ?​
    8·1 answer
  • Please use complete sentences.
    11·2 answers
  • Who are the special guest at maghi ?​
    11·1 answer
  • Write a sentence for the following word: generosity.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!