The answer to your question is 405, because look divide 324 by 4 becasue thats how many fifths are being used then multiply the answer which is 81 by 405
Answer:
C) $10,000 invested at 6.7% compounded quarterly over 7 years yields the greater return.
Step-by-step explanation:
-We determine the effective interest rate in both scenarios and use it to calculate the investment's value after 7 years.
#Given n=7yrs, P=$10,000 and i=6.6% compounded monthly:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f76c8/f76c80daa06893f9c518d69b5fb016b5a86a6d76" alt="i_m=(1+i/m)^m-1\\\\=(1+0.066/12)^{12}-1=0.06803\\\\\therefore A=P(1+i_m)^n\\\\=10000(1.06803)^7\\\\\approx \$15,852.00"
#Given n=7rs, P=10000, i=6.7%
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/044a4/044a44b52b39dbaa9d4d34ddde9ac37b6228d61c" alt="i_m=(1+i/m)^m-1\\\\=(1+0.067/4)^{4}-1=0.06870\\\\\therefore A=P(1+i_m)^n\\\\=10000(1.06870)^7\\\\\approx \$15,921.75"
Hence, the investment has the largest value($15,921.75) when the interest rate is compounded quarterly.
Answer:
No DB is not a perpendicular bisector of AC
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because as AC is a straight line it's angle degree is 180 which when bisected by DB becomes,
180 ÷ 2 = 90
On both the angles i.e <BDC = <NDA = 90°
To make it a perpendicular bisector but
<BDC is not equal to <NDA is not equal to 90°.
Hence, DB is not a perpendicular bisector of line AC.
The estimation for m would be 120. Happy thanksgiving