Answer:
Gordon should revise sentence 1 to provide specific details about what "struck" him as he first entered the room.
Explanation: Read the paragraph from Gordon's personal narrative.
1 When I first entered the room, I was really struck by what I saw. 2 It was my first day of cooking lessons, and I was on my way to fulfilling my dreams of one day becoming a chef in my own world-renowned restaurant. 3 I had spent countless hours of my childhood watching my parents, both professional chefs, prepare savory meals for my sisters and me. 4: From them, I had already obtained a solid foundation of cooking basics. 5 : However, it was in this room that I would build upon those basics and begin my ascent as a chef in my own right.
I hope I can help you Good night :)
Examine this as light that would come in and light that would go out. The transparency of windows, the ability to see through windows, is the purpose of windows in this statement, allowing something to go in and out. What is the light in you? Now with this part of the statement, it is then expressing the metaphor as a direction from inside of someone to the outside. So it some one has a window, the ability or platform to say things and have people listen, what is the value if the person only speaks of hate and violent things. What value is there to listening to someone who speaks of these things through their "window"?
Let's consider the windows as opportunities to positively influence other people. An excellent situation would be a teacher. The have the "window", the class time to use effectively and beneficially for the students who are in the class. But what if the teacher only wants to pass the time and get through the class, not really imparting any knowledge, or being to lazy or indifferent or not caring. A window - the classroom, but no passion nor energy or light.
This example I believe best illustrates what it means to have a window, but no light.
Answer:
formal language.
Explanation:
Your going to want too use proper English and be very informative too the reader who will be going over your application.
Hope this helps.
I think the answer is of D
Strengthens his credibility and that of the nonviolent direct action protestors. He does this by describing the qualities of the people involved in the nonviolent movements, namely the ability not to retaliate against overwhelming violence.