1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
san4es73 [151]
3 years ago
15

A country can't be " sovereign " unless it controls its territory ( true or false)

History
1 answer:
rodikova [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Sovereignty basically means supreme power or authority. A country can be called Sovereign if the country, has one centralized government that has the power to govern a specific area. If a country can't control its territory, It can't be Sovereign.

<em>Mark me as Brainliest, if this answer helped</em>

You might be interested in
European History-Answer Quick Will Give Branliest
Stels [109]

Answer:

Charles Darwin (1809–1882)

Context for Darwin:

• Growth of scientific education and institutions

• Declining church attendance and growing secularization

• New social discourses

o Positivism and the growing prestige of science — Auguste Comte (1798–1857), Positive

Philosophy (1830–1842); science as culminating point of human intellectual and social

development.

o Materialism — mental and spiritual forces and cultural ideals were seen to be the product of

physical forces; truth found in material existence, not intuition or feeling.

Darwin’s major contributions and ideas

• On the Origin of Species (1859)

o Theory of natural selection articulated as the principle mechanism through which evolution

occurred; similar ideas were developed nearly simultaneously by Alfred R. Wallace (1823–1913).

o More living organisms came into existence than could survive; variety of species is infinite;

new biological forms emerged from older ones.

o Those species possessing unique traits that made survival possible were thought to have a

marginal advantage; only those well adapted to a specific environment survived to reproduce.

o Life constituted a competitive struggle for existence (some textbooks note Darwin borrowing

ideas for this theory from Thomas Malthus).

• The Descent of Man (1871)

o Discussed implications of natural selection for humans.

o Indicated that the human body, consciousness and religious intuition evolved to ensure the

survival of the species.

o A divine being was not needed to provide an image or model for humanity.

Consequences (challenges to traditional ways of thinking)

• Called into question biblical narrative of creation; challenged traditional Judeo-Christian view of nature

as immutable and humanity as the unique creation of God.

• Challenged Enlightenment perspectives.

o Rejected the idea that nature and society were harmonious by focusing instead on ideas of

competition and continual struggle.

o Undermined assumption that nature was tranquil and noble and humans were univers

3 0
3 years ago
Acellus
kirza4 [7]
A. The thought of writing a new Constitution began.
3 0
3 years ago
Which pair of Supreme Court cases upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases?
kirill115 [55]

The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.

<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>

In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.

The missing information is given below:

A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)

B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)

C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)

Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966).  the correct statement is option C.

learn more about  case of Wainwright and Arizona:

brainly.com/question/10320938

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Toward the end of the Civil War, how did General Grant affect Southern civilians?
klasskru [66]
B is the correct answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could the absolute monarchy of louis xvi best be described? * 20 points democracy constitutional government limited governme
zlopas [31]
A government in which the leaders have no power were not subject to the rules. Rulers had unlimited powers
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Improvements that labor unions sought to bring to their workers were:
    7·2 answers
  • What conditions were favorable to the development of agriculture
    10·1 answer
  • Based upon what seemed like solid guarantees from the british government, the arab revolt, led by emir faysal of medina and brit
    8·1 answer
  • Which colony was the first to declare itself independent of great britain?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone type me a three paragraph essay on the history of cleopatra I need it tonight!! Please hurry if you can!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Why did president bush decide to confront iraq
    8·2 answers
  • What are the processes of the three branches
    10·1 answer
  • Match each factor of production with its definition
    8·1 answer
  • Someone pls help me I will make you brain
    14·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe how renaissance ideas spread beyond italy?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!