Answer:
<em> Nutmeg: from the Spice Islands was of particular importance to the Dutch.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Subsequently, the islands were an important strategic base for the highly profitable spice trade. Nutmeg and cloves largely drove the spice trade</em>.
<u><em>I hope this helps and have a good day!</em></u>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Al-Dabagh was known as a dermatologist. He met up with the standard of academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. There was issues when the school failed to give him his certificate due to various inappropriate and indecent behaviors.
The matter was taken to court and there was a judgement on him to be given the certificate but the school appealed the case and the judgement was rescinded by the Supreme Court. He wasn’t given the certificate afterwards.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
<span>She is interested in equality. She wants to see if what she in earning is comparative to others around her. If she makes less than others, she will wish she earned more and feel that she deserves to make more after working hard to graduate. She hopes that everyone can earn what they deserve.</span>
Im pretty sure it is false. they may have used it to try to cure the disease, but it could never have worked.
my apologies if its wrong
