Answer: Cocooning
Explanation:
Cocooning could be described as a method of training that revolve around protection from harm which is not really known, i.e a form of preventive measures taken in place to protect from the unknown. Sandy and Will are training their children with the method of Cocooning, where they limited their movement and activities around themselves, their parents.
Answer:
foster care youth
Explanation:
According to my research, Project Confirm was a program created on July 1998 by the City of New York's child welfare and juvenile justice agencies to make a difference with the foster youth in the juvenile justice system. They want to basically reduce the detention of foster care youth who have been arrested.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
As for the largest number of ports, i'm pretty sure that the British and the French held the most of it.
I'm not sure about which one is the least though, but it won't be the country that had a strong military empire.
Answer:
This scenario is an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy is simply having an idea,notion, expectation or a view about an individual or anything and most times these individuals or entities ends up behaving in the way we thought about them because we believe they will( result in the other person or entity acting in ways that confirm the views or expectations). it is a sociopsychological phenomenon.
Self fulfilling proheccy can also be describe as prediction or fortune telling. it is our beliefs and expectations been affected or influenced by our behavior at the subconscious level. AN example of this prophecy is when John thinks his son will kill him in future and ends up leaving his son in the forest for wild animals to devour. the child ends up been rescued by a passerby and raise up by the rescuer. in future time, the child ends up accidentally killing his own father without knowing who he really was.
Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
