Question

Juli says she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10.
Which statement explains whether Juli is correct?
a. She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio.
b. She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2.
c. She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10.
d. She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.

Answer 1

When is it due do u need it rn

Answer 2

Sure but I think it’s C