The answer is 22 , you’re welcome!
69 babyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Answer: 30°, 67° e 83°.
Step-by-step explanation: The angles are (2x + 16)/5 , x e x + 16°
Adding all the angles, comes:
(2x + 16)/5 + x + x + 16° = 180° ;
2x + 16° + 5x + 5x + 80° = 900° ;
12x = 900° - 16° - 80° ;
12x = 804°° ;
x = 804°/12 ;
x = 67°
So, the first angle is (2,67 + 16)/5 = 30°, the second is 67° and the third is 83°.
Answer:
x=35.35
Step-by-step explanation:
If you multiply 
by 10.1 that will cancel out the 10.1s, then since you multiplies one side of the equation by something you have to multiply the other too. So 3.5*10.1 = 35.35. Then since the 10.1s canceled out this leaves us with x=35.35. Let me know if you need any more help.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that two linear regression models have the same number of explanatory variables
First model has coefficient of determination as 0.45 while other
0.65
we know that R^2 is the proportion showing the variation of dependent because of variation in independent variables.
Hence a higher R square is always better because it ensures more linearity and hence more accuracy in the regression equation.
Hence 0.65 model is better than 0.45 model.
The given statement is false.
