All categories

3 years ago

What does A(2,5) become after rotated 360 degrees?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Its D because when you rotate 360 degrees you end up back where you were

You might be interested in

Solve 4x + 11 = k for x. O A. x-4-11 B. x= k-7 C. x = 4k - 44 D. x = K-11 4

Arisa [49]

Answer:

x= 1/4k + −11/4

Step-by-step explanation:

4x+11=k

Step 1: Add -11 to both sides.

4x+11+−11=k+−11

4x=k−11

Step 2: Divide both sides by 4.

4x/4 = k−11/4

x=1/4k + −11/4

Answer:

x=1/4k + −11/4

If you are solving for K:

Let's solve for k.

4x+11=k

Step 1: Flip the equation.

k=4x+11

Answer:

k=4x+11

5 0

3 years ago

Helpp me please im confused

galben [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

When two fractions refer to the same whole explain why the fraction with a lesser denominator has larger pieces than the fractio

dexar [7]

Because there are less pieces the whole is split up into. For instance, if you have 1 bag of cookies, you would get more cookies per person if it was split between 2 people than if it was split between 10, because each person gets more of the whole, and there's less people to split up that whole.
since you have an equal amount of pieces from each, the whole that was split into the least pieces, or the number with the smaller denominator will be larger since the pieces will be larger

3 0

4 years ago

When f(x) is replaced with f(x)+k, the graph that results is shown below K=__?

serious [3.7K]

Answer:

k = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Parent function of the given graph → f(x) = (x - 1)²

If the parent function is shifted 6 units up.

Equation of the translated function will be → g(x) = (x - 1)² + 6

g(x) = f(x) + 6

Therefore, k = 6 will be the answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Consider the triangles shown. If mUTV < mUTS < mSTR, which statement is true?

Tresset [83]

Answer:

The true statement is UV < US < SR ⇒ 1st statement

Step-by-step explanation:

"I have added screenshot of the complete question as well as the

diagram"

* Lets revise the hinge theorem

- If two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another

triangle, and the measure of the included angle between these two

sides of the first triangle is greater than the measure of the included

angle of the second triangle then the length of the third side of the

first triangle is longer than the length of the third side of the second

triangle

* Lets solve the problem

- The figure has three triangles have a common vertex T

- m∠UTV < m∠UTS < m∠STR

- From the hinge theorem above

∵ The side opposite to ∠UTV is VU

∵ The side opposite to ∠UTS is US

∵ The side opposite to ∠STR is SR

∵ m∠UTV < m∠UTS < m∠STR

∴ UV < US < SR

* The true statement is UV < US < SR

5 0

3 years ago