In contract law, undue influence differs from duress in that duress includes improper threat which is missing in undue influence. Duress is the use of any kind of threat, force or psychological pressure in order to dominate someone and make him take decisions against his will. The two principal categories of duress are physical and economic duress.
Physical duress is when one party uses a threat of bodily harm or death to make another party agree to a certain contract. Physical duress can be inflicted on individuals as well as goods. Economic duress is when any type of economic pressure is used by a party to force the other party to enter into an illegal contract which they would not have agreed to otherwise.
Giving someone life threats if they do not perform a given task is an example of duress.
To learn more about duress here
brainly.com/question/14781717
#SPJ4
Answer:
In Roman Empire, there a 2 amjor categories of people living in it. The previledged and the poor. The poorer citizens of Roman was unable to afford the food sold in the city hence the need for a subsidized and free alternative to be offered to them.
<em>In order to meet thier demands, the Roman government needs to purchase grains from Egypt because of its cost effectiveness. </em>
<em>Another major reason was on the need to maintain the peace of Rome through offering people access to buy the subsidized grains imported from Egypt.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
Government is to big
Explanation:
It is a person's right to make their own decisions whether it be good or bad. the government should not intervene in the people's daily lives.
Answer:
The law must be in the interest of the people, reasonable and should not be too harsh or rigid.
Explanation:
We consider in making the law that the law must be in the interest of the people, reasonable and should not be too harsh or rigid. If the law will be implemented in the country, peace will occur because people know the consequences of breaking law. Law is very important in the society because it maintains peace but rigidity of law is not good for the society. Due to rigidity, the law is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society.
By showing that the people who are doing the campaigns are standing up for the victims
