The correct answer is A
hope this helps .
<span>Answer: Option (C) Never
Explanation:
Irrational numbers are the numbers that CANNOT be written as the fraction of integers. On the other hand, integers can ALWAYS be written as a fraction.
For Example:
10 (an integer) can be written in a fraction forms as: 10/1, 100/10 etc.
Hence all integers are NEVER irrational numbers.
Information:
Few might say that although Pi (3.141592653...) is an irrational number, but we can write it as 22/7. 22/7 is mere approximation we use for the ease of calculations, NOT an accurate fraction for Pi.</span>
Answer:
A repeating decimal is not a rational number and The product of two irrational numbers is always rational
Step-by-step explanation:
One statement that is not true is "The product of two irrational numbers is always rational". Take for example the irrational numbers √2 and √3. Their product is √6 which is also irrational.
The other false statement is "A repeating decimal is not a rational number". Take for example the repeating decimal 0.33333..... It can be written as 1/3 which is a rational number.
Lateral Area, namely the area of its sides, namely excluding its base.
well, the pyramid is standing on one of its triangular faces, so we'll have to exclude that.
now, let's notice, is a square pyramid, so it has an 8x8 square, and it has triangular faces that have a <u>base of 8 and a height of 22</u>.
![\bf \stackrel{\textit{square's area}}{(8\cdot 8)}~~+~~\stackrel{\textit{3 triangular faces' area}}{3\left[ \cfrac{1}{2}(8)(22) \right]}\implies 64+264\implies 328](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsquare%27s%20area%7D%7D%7B%288%5Ccdot%208%29%7D~~%2B~~%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7B3%20triangular%20faces%27%20area%7D%7D%7B3%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%288%29%2822%29%20%5Cright%5D%7D%5Cimplies%2064%2B264%5Cimplies%20328)
