The answer is false. i.e. when a football players loses a touchdown he may get discriminated especially if he is known for being really good at making touchdowns.
A) Anatomist studies the structure of temperature sensors in the body.
Physiologist studies how the body detects dropping body temperature.
An anatomist studies WHAT the structures are of humans (and other living organisms). Anatomy can be macroscopic or microscopic and discusses the way the parts (from minute to big) interact to form a functional unit. The study of anatomy is often paired with the study of physiology, but the two are distinct from each other. Physiology covers HOW and WHY the parts function. A physiologist specializes in the study of living organisms’ functions, activities and organic processes.
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer: A general term. ... or view at which you look at something. This is inclusive of the body as a hole, or organs, organ systems, tissues, etc.
The answer to the given statement above would be TRUE. Yes, it is true that Title IX has been viewed as the basis for enacting a "quota system" within high school and collegiate athletics.
Answer:
Explanation:
Forehand groundstroke effectiveness is important for tennis success. Ball topspin angular velocity (TAV) and accuracy are important for fore hand groundstroke effectiveness, and have been extensively studied, previously; despite previous, quality studies, it was unclear whether certain racquet kinematics relate to ball TAV and shot accuracy during the forehand groundstroke. This study evaluated potential relationships between (1) ball TAV and (2) forehand accuracy, and five measures of racquet kinematics: racquet head impact angle (i.e., closed or open face), horizontal and vertical racquet head velocity before impact, racquet head trajectory (resultant velocity direction, relative to horizontal) before impact, and hitting zone length (quasi-linear displacement, immediately before and after impact). Thirteen collegiate-level tennis players hit forehand groundstrokes in a biomechanics laboratory, where racquet kinematics and ball TAV were measured, and on a tennis court, to assess accuracy. Correlational statistics were used to evaluate potential relationships between racquet kinematics, and ball TAV (mixed model) and forehand accuracy (between-subjects model; α = 0.05). We observed an average (1) racquet head impact angle, (2) racquet head trajectory before impact, relative to horizontal, (3) racquet head horizontal velocity before impact, (4) racquet head vertical velocity before impact, and (5) hitting zone length of 80.4 ± 3.6˚, 18.6 ± 4.3˚, 15.4 ± 1.4 m·s-1, 6.6 ± 2.2 m·s-1, and 79.8 ± 8.6 mm, respectively; and an average ball TAV of 969 ± 375 revolutions per minute. Only racquet head impact angle and racquet head vertical velocity, before impact, significantly correlated with ball TAV (p < 0.01). None of the observed racquet kinematics significantly correlated to the measures of forehand accuracy. These results confirmed mechanical logic and indicate that increased ball TAV is associated with a more closed racquet head impact angle (ranging from 70 to 85˚, relative to the ground) and increased racquet head vertical velocity before impact.
