The Lesser Sooty Owl is a strictly nocturnal bird. Hides & sleeps during the day in dense foliage, between tangles of aerial roots, in all kinds of crevices, or beneath overhanging banks. Hunts in clearings and near roads, but also inside forest.
<h3>
Answer: D) 95</h3>
===============================================================
Explanation:
First, let's calculate angle BYC. This is the angle formed by the chords that subtend the arcs mentioned. This angle faces or is aimed toward the direction of the arcs. To find this angle, we'll average the arc measures like so:
angle BYC = (arcAD + arcBC)/2
angle BYC = (50+120)/2
angle BYC = 170/2
angle BYC = 85 degrees
Then we'll use the idea that angles BYC and DYC are supplementary (aka they form a straight 180 degree angle)
angleBYC + angleDYC = 180
angleDYC = 180 - angleBYC
angleDYC = 180 - 85
angleDYC = 95 degrees
which is why the answer is choice D.
Answer:
Both
Step-by-step explanation:
Nour made a tree diagram that is right and Rana made a graph that has all the outcomes and also it is right on khan academy
Answer:
P(2)=0 then x-2 is a factor of P(x)
Step-by-step explanation:
To see if (x-2) is a factor just plug in 2 for x into the polynomial expression.
2(2)^3-3(2)^2-17(2)+30
2(8)-3(4)-34+30
16-12-34+30
4-34+30
-30+30
0
Since P(2)=0 then x-2 is a factor
Answer:
The lesser number of workbooks are 1,000
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct question is
The profit P (in thousands of dollars) for an educational publisher can be modeled by P=-b³+5b²+b where b is the number of workbooks printed (in thousands). Currently, the publisher prints 5000 workbooks and makes a profit of $5000. What lesser number of workbooks could the publisher print and still yield the same profit?
we have
For 
substitute in the equation and solve for b
Remember that the profit and the number of workbooks is in thousands
so
P=5
Using a graphing tool
Solve the cubic function
The solutions are
x=-1
x=1
x=5
therefore
The lesser number of workbooks are 1,000
<u><em>Verify</em></u>
For b=1
-----> is in thousands
so
----> is ok
