I think its the second one
<span>They became more concerned with foreign policy.
hope this helps
</span>
Biological, nutritional, chemical, physical, and social are the five agents recognized today. As Germ theory provided a framework for understanding the causal agents of disease.
<h3>What is Germ theory?</h3>
The germ theory is a school of thought in medicine that holds that some diseases are caused by tiny, microscopic, body-invading organisms that can only be seen under a microscope.
The "one pathogen to one disease" paradigm was built on the germ concept of disease, which Robert Koch put forth in the late 19th century and had an impact on the development of diagnostic microbiology in medicine.
Thus, Biological, nutritional, chemical, physical, and social are the five agents recognized today.
For more details about Germ theory, click here:
brainly.com/question/818392
#SPJ1
Answer:
Risk response planning
Explanation:
Risk response planning can be seen as a way of initiating diverse options and reducing or elimination risk to the project,and also create an avenue to increase the opportunity impact.
Risk response planning are plans done by a project manager to detect and find a solution to a threat to a project even before it occurs.
However, Risk can be managed with this three steps. 1). Risk identification, 2). Risk analysis, 3). Developing risk response plan.
The appropriate response is self-fulfilling prophecy. A self-fulfilling prophecy is a forecast that straightforwardly or in a roundabout way makes itself turn out to be valid, by the very terms of the prediction itself, because of positive criticism amongst conviction and conduct.
Answer:
Electoral polls can be considered as one of the most useful tools that the political class has to press public opinion. However, its inclusion as a tool of democratic government has always aroused, and still continues to raise, widely held opinions. From the beginning, different authors contributed their different perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of this instrument helping to contribute to the construction of the public image of the electoral polls.
Thus, some scholars pointed out that the results obtained from the representative samples would reveal the benefits that could be obtained from the correct application of the new instrument. They argued that the reliability of the surveys was the fundamental axis of their usefulness and legitimacy, recommending their use as the method more effective to improve a representative government. And they insisted on the importance of knowing and measuring public opinion at shorter intervals than inter-electoral periods. It also defended the scientific status of the surveys with the objective of being able to train them as a response to the government by public opinion and as a new instrument in the service of information.
