All categories

2 years ago

Plz help me plz help me

Mathematics

1 answer:

sladkih [1.3K]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

In one hour Stephanie earns $1.50 more than Marco

Step-by-step explanation:

w=9h

H is a variable

9×hour= wage

9×15= $135

9×18= $162

157.50-135=$22.50

189-162=$27

27-22.50=4.50

Now cause its per hour we know she earns $4.50 more in 3 hours.

4.50÷3=$1.50

You might be interested in

I have just one question, could someone please answer it?? (see linked file)

Annette [7]

The solution is x=1 and y=-2

Further explanation:

Given equations are:

$\frac{7}{2}x-\frac{1}{2}y=\frac{9}{2}\\3x-y=5$

Multiplying equation no. 1 with 2 will give us:

$7x-y=9$ Eqn 3

From equation no 2:

$3x-y=5\\-y=5-3x\\y=3x-5$

Putting the value of y in eqn 3

$7x-(3x-5)=9\\7x-3x+5=9\\4x=9-5\\4x=4\\\frac{4x}{4}=\frac{4}{4}\\x=1\\Putting\ x=1\ in\ equation\ 2\\3(1)-y=5\\3-y=5\\-y=5-3\\-y=2\\y=-2\\$

The solution is x=1 and y=-2

Keywords: Linear equations, Solution set

Learn more about linear equations at:

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0

3 years ago

universal pet house sells vinyl doghouses and treated lumber doghouses. It takes the company 5 hours to build a vinyl doghouse a

I am Lyosha [343]

5x + 2y = 50

x + 2y = 30

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Li transformed rectangle ABCD. The image is shown. Does Li’s transformation represent a translation? Yes, the image represents a

iris [78.8K]

Answer:

C. No, the image does not have the same orientation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Just took the quiz.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

2 years ago

Which point-slope equation represents a line that passes through (3,-2) with a slope of -4/5?

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

y + 2 = -4/5 (x - 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

y - y1 = m (x - x1). Put in your points for y1 and x1, and always remember to flip your signs.

unfortunately, I don't know why that isn't one of your answers, so sticking with the positive 2 I would choose y+2=- (- 3) if I were you. Looks like the -4/5 disappeared somehow?

Hope this helps

8 0

2 years ago

Plz help me plz help me​

Plz help me plz help me