1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna11 [192]
3 years ago
12

Prove that under root 2 is a irrational number​

Mathematics
2 answers:
torisob [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Let's suppose √2 is a rational number. Then we can write it √2  = a/b where a, b are whole numbers, b not zero.

We additionally assume that this a/b is simplified to lowest terms, since that can obviously be done with any fraction. Notice that in order for a/b to be in simplest terms, both of a and b cannot be even. One or both must be odd. Otherwise, we could simplify a/b further.

From the equality √2  = a/b it follows that 2 = a2/b2,  or  a2 = 2 · b2.  So the square of a is an even number since it is two times something.

From this we know that a itself is also an even number. Why? Because it can't be odd; if a itself was odd, then a · a would be odd too. Odd number times odd number is always odd. Check it if you don't believe me!

Okay, if a itself is an even number, then a is 2 times some other whole number. In symbols, a = 2k where k is this other number. We don't need to know what k is; it won't matter. Soon comes the contradiction.

If we substitute a = 2k into the original equation 2 = a2/b2, this is what we get:

2=(2k)2/b22=4k2/b22*b2=4k2b2=2k2

This means that b2 is even, from which follows again that b itself is even. And that is a contradiction!!!

WHY is that a contradiction? Because we started the whole process assuming that a/b was simplified to lowest terms, and now it turns out that a and b both would be even. We ended at a contradiction; thus our original assumption (that √2 is rational) is not correct. Therefore √2 cannot be rational.

(I copied this from the internet, but hope it helps!)

liberstina [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Let's suppose √2 is a rational number. Then we can write it √2 = a/b where a, b are whole numbers, b not zero.

We additionally assume that this a/b is simplified to lowest terms, since that can obviously be done with any fraction. Notice that in order for a/b to be in simplest terms, both of a and b cannot be even. One or both must be odd. Otherwise, we could simplify a/b further.

From the equality √2 = a/b it follows that 2 = a2/b2, or a2 = 2 · b2. So the square of a is an even number since it is two times something.

From this we know that a itself is also an even number. Why? Because it can't be odd; if a itself was odd, then a · a would be odd too. Odd number times odd number is always odd. Check it if you don't believe me!

Okay, if a itself is an even number, then a is 2 times some other whole number. In symbols, a = 2k where k is this other number. We don't need to know what k is; it won't matter. Soon comes the contradiction.

If we substitute a = 2k into the original equation 2 = a2/b2, this is what we get:

2 = (2k)2/b2

2 = 4k2/b2

2*b2 = 4k2

b2 = 2k2

This means that b2 is even, from which follows again that b itself is even. And that is a contradiction!!!

WHY is that a contradiction? Because we started the whole process assuming that a/b was simplified to lowest terms, and now it turns out that a and b both would be even. We ended at a contradiction; thus our original assumption (that √2 is rational) is not correct. Therefore √2 cannot be rational.

You might be interested in
What is the value of f (x) = x (to the second power) - 6 evaluated for x = -2?
katrin [286]
I hope this helps you

8 0
3 years ago
Please help due in 15 min
dimulka [17.4K]
It is 63 students, because 84 divided by 2 is 42 then half of 42 is 21 so 21 is 25% so then you do 21 x 3 = 63
3 0
3 years ago
Two trains are traveling towards each other at a constant speed. The trains are currently 714 miles from each other. The speeds
shutvik [7]
55mph.

you can solve it using the equation distance=speed x time

your total distance is 714, and you have 2 trains, one traveling some speed, x, and one traveling x+8, both traveling for 7 hours. 
your equation would look like this
714 = x(7) + (x+8)(7)
and you can then solve for x, which would be 47. this is the speed of the slower train, but 47+8=55 with give you the speed of the faster train. 
6 0
3 years ago
Gina visits her local farm stand to buy apples and oranges to make a fruit salad. She has​ $10.00 to spend. If she buys only ora
icang [17]

Answer:

29 oranges rounding up but the exact answer is 29.41176

Step-by-step explanation:

It would be 29.41176 if you want the answer to be exact. All you're doing is dividing 10.00 ÷ 0.34 and getting 29 oranges :)

3 0
3 years ago
This is the image yall were asking for
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

angle b+54 = 90 degrees

90 - 54 = b

36° = angle b

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following equations has no solution?<br> 3x+1=2x+1<br> 3x+1=3x+1<br> 3x+1=3x+2
    14·2 answers
  • Which is greater 2/3 or 1/3
    6·2 answers
  • Iris charges a fee for her consulting services plus an hourly rate that is 15 1times her fee. On a 7-hour job, Iris charged $470
    10·1 answer
  • What are 3 cups 7 ounces in ounces
    15·1 answer
  • I’ll mark as BRANLIEST!!
    8·2 answers
  • PLZZZ SEND HELPPP ANSWER QUICKK
    12·2 answers
  • Given f(x) =x-7 and g(x) =x2 find g(f(4))
    8·1 answer
  • The temperature in Oxford on Friday is -8 c
    11·2 answers
  • What is this answer? _x - 4 &gt; -10
    8·1 answer
  • So far this year, Adam has played 30 games of chess and has only won 6 of them. What is the minimum number of additional games h
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!