The acceleration of the particle is given by the formula mentioned below:
Differentiate the position vector with respect to t.
![\begin{gathered} \frac{ds(t)}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\sqrt[]{\mleft(t^3+1\mright)} \\ =-\frac{1}{2}(t^3+1)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\times3t^2 \\ =\frac{3}{2}\frac{t^2}{\sqrt{(t^3+1)}} \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bds%28t%29%7D%7Bdt%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7Bd%7D%7Bdt%7D%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%5Cmleft%28t%5E3%2B1%5Cmright%29%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%28t%5E3%2B1%29%5E%7B-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ctimes3t%5E2%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%5Cfrac%7Bt%5E2%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%28t%5E3%2B1%29%7D%7D%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
Differentiate both sides of the obtained equation with respect to t.
![\begin{gathered} \frac{d^2s(t)}{dx^2}=\frac{3}{2}(\frac{2t}{\sqrt[]{(t^3+1)}}+t^2(-\frac{3}{2})\times\frac{1}{(t^3+1)^{\frac{3}{2}}}) \\ =\frac{3t}{\sqrt[]{(t^3+1)}}-\frac{9}{4}\frac{t^2}{(t^3+1)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bd%5E2s%28t%29%7D%7Bdx%5E2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%28%5Cfrac%7B2t%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%28t%5E3%2B1%29%7D%7D%2Bt%5E2%28-%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%29%5Ctimes%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%28t%5E3%2B1%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%7D%7D%29%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B3t%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B%28t%5E3%2B1%29%7D%7D-%5Cfrac%7B9%7D%7B4%7D%5Cfrac%7Bt%5E2%7D%7B%28t%5E3%2B1%29%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%7D%7D%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
Substitute t=2 in the above equation to obtain the acceleration of the particle at 2 seconds.
![\begin{gathered} a(t=1)=\frac{3}{\sqrt[]{2}}-\frac{9}{4\times2^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ =1.32ft/sec^2 \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20a%28t%3D1%29%3D%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B%5D%7B2%7D%7D-%5Cfrac%7B9%7D%7B4%5Ctimes2%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B2%7D%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%20%3D1.32ft%2Fsec%5E2%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
The initial position is obtained at t=0. Substitute t=0 in the given position function.
Hello!
The equation for a circle is
(h,k) is the center
r is the radius
Put in the values you know
Simplify
The equation is
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The equation is
6x + 12y = 48
Step-by-step explanation:
Standard form another way of writing a linear equation. It is in the form
Ax + By = C
Total amount with Samantha = $48
Single player games = $6 each
Multi player games = $12 each
Let
Number of Single player games = x
Number of Multi player games = y
The number of single player games (x) and the number of multi player games (y) Samantha can buy is
6x + 12y = 48
That is price × quantity of single player games + price × quantity of multi player games = Total amount with Samantha
So,first step is to write ![(fog)(-4)) =f[g(-4)] \\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%28fog%29%28-4%29%29%20%3Df%5Bg%28-4%29%5D%20%5C%5C%20)
Now we start from inner paranthesis
,we need to first find value of
![g(-4) =\frac{\sqrt{12-(-4)}}{3}\\ =\frac{\sqrt{12+4}}{3}\\ =\frac{\sqrt{16}}{3}\\ =\frac{4}{3}\\ (fog)(-4)) =f[g(-4)] =f(\frac{4}{3}) =9(4/3)^{2} =9*(16/9) =144/9 =16](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20g%28-4%29%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B12-%28-4%29%7D%7D%7B3%7D%5C%5C%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B12%2B4%7D%7D%7B3%7D%5C%5C%0A%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B16%7D%7D%7B3%7D%5C%5C%0A%3D%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B3%7D%5C%5C%0A%28fog%29%28-4%29%29%20%3Df%5Bg%28-4%29%5D%20%3Df%28%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B3%7D%29%20%3D9%284%2F3%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D9%2A%2816%2F9%29%20%3D144%2F9%20%3D16%20)
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
