The appropriate rider allows premium payments to be waived in the event of disability. There is usually a waiting period of 3 or 6 months once the policy owner becomes disabled before the first premium will be waived.
Long-term disability insurance plans are made to pay benefits for a longer time. The premiums are normally greater the longer the benefit term. This is why insurance companies offer optional clauses so you can customise your coverage to meet your needs. Benefit for Basic Partial Disability, If you sustain a disease or injury that affects your capacity to work but does not result in total disability, this offers partial payments. Benefit for Enhanced Partial Disability, For fee-for-service professionals and business owners, this specific Guardian rider may be especially useful. It offers benefits when you experience an income loss of 15% or more simply as a result of illness or injury.
Learn more about Disability riders here:
brainly.com/question/13120997
#SPJ4
Answer:
insufficient strength of the manipulation
Explanation:
The non-significant results may have occurred because of insufficient strength of the manipulation. Since the variable being tested in this scenario had a very slight difference it caused insignificant results. The variable in the study (light bulb) needs to be drastically different in order for it to have an effect on the subjects and provide results that differ. The 100-watt and 125-light bulb provide almost the same luminosity levels.
Answer:
Explanation:
psychoanalytic theory, the ego's protective methods of reducing anxiety by .... the "third force" in psychology because it rejects the notion that childhood ... or other forces in the environment (behaviorism) dictate a person's personality.
a. In the prisoners' dilemma game self-interest leads each prisoner to confess. to a breakdown of any agreement that the prisoners might have made before being questioned to an outcome that is not particularly good for either prisoner.
What is prisoners' dilemma game?
The prisoner's dilemma is a common illustration of a game explored in game theory that demonstrates why two logical people could disagree even though it seems to be in their best interests to collaborate.
The possible outcomes:
- If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves two years in prison
- If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve three years in prison
- If A remains silent but B betrays A, A will serve three years in prison and B will be set free
- If A and B both remain silent, both of them will serve one year in prison (on the lesser charge).
Learn more about prisoners' dilemma here:
brainly.com/question/22597804
#SPJ4
