The American court system is identified as an “______”

Law

1 answer:

liubo4ka [24]1 year ago

4 0

Option C is correct. United States uses the adversarial system in its courts. The opposing attorneys have responsibility for controlling presentation of lawsuit. Attorneys may not lie but have no duty to volunteer facts that don't support their client's case.

An impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgement in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.

Because it leaves less room for the state to be prejudiced against the defendant, advocates of the adversarial system frequently claim that it is more equitable and less prone to misuse than the inquisitional approach.

To know more about Adversarial system:

brainly.com/question/5921518

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Is the power of a court to inquire into facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare judgment in any matter.

Alex Ar [27]

C. Jurisdiction because they are the ones you keep everything in place while in court, they have and declare the judgment in the end and are to listen and apply the laws so nobody gets declared with a unfair law for which they’re the ones who have this power

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do the four seasons also<br> represent a cycle?

Aneli [31]

Because each year it goes through the same cycle of seasons
spring,summer,fall,winter,repeat
hope this helped

6 0

2 years ago

What does the PEN model stand for?

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism (PEN

3 0

2 years ago

A defendant was on trial for having committed a murder in 1995. Taking the stand, the defendant denied being present in the city

Snezhnost [94]

This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.

8 0

2 years ago

Pleaseee help this is for criminal justice

konstantin123 [22]

I don’t thin k I. An fine a pic

6 0

2 years ago